<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>IRS Tax Talk</title>
	<link>http://irstaxtalk.com</link>
	<description>This is not just another WordPress weblog - It's about your tax money!</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Reverse Mortgages - Taxable?  Deductible?</title>
		<link>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/03/05/reverse-mortgages-taxable-deductible/</link>
		<comments>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/03/05/reverse-mortgages-taxable-deductible/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/03/05/reverse-mortgages-taxable-deductible/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question:   Are the amounts a taxpayer receives from a &#8220;reverse mortgage&#8221; taxable?  Deductible?
Answer:   NO to both.  Interest on a reverse mortgage loan added monthly to the outstanding loan balance as it accrues is neither taxable in a cash method lender&#8217;s gross income nor deductible by a cash method borrower at the time it is added.

The primary [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 16pt"><strong>Question:   Are the amounts a taxpayer receives from a &#8220;reverse mortgage&#8221; taxable?  Deductible?</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 16pt"><span><strong>Answer:   NO to both.  </strong>Interest on a reverse mortgage loan added monthly to the outstanding loan balance as it accrues is neither taxable in a cash method lender&#8217;s gross income nor deductible by a cash method borrower at the time it is added.</span></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; tab-stops: list .5in" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14pt">The primary purpose of a reverse mortgage loan is to enable elderly persons with limited incomes to remain in their homes.</span></li>
<li style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; tab-stops: list .5in" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14pt">Repayment of the loan is due when the principal amount has been fully paid to the borrower (they receive monthly allotments),</span></li>
<li style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; tab-stops: list .5in" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14pt">The residence that secures the loan is sold,</span></li>
<li style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; tab-stops: list .5in" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 14pt">The borrower dies, or t</span><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 14pt">he borrower ceases to use the home as the borrower&#8217;s principal residence</span></li>
</ul>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/03/05/reverse-mortgages-taxable-deductible/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Work Clothes Deduction</title>
		<link>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/03/03/work-clothes-deduction/</link>
		<comments>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/03/03/work-clothes-deduction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/03/03/work-clothes-deduction/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are Work Clothes a Deduction?  
Generally yes if they are work clothes or uniforms if required and NOT suitable for everyday use.  That deduction would include the cost and upkeep if both requirements are met.
If I purchase a nice suit for business, it is not a deduction as it has alternate use.
If I am a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14pt"><font face="Calibri">Are Work Clothes a Deduction?  </font></span></p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14pt"></span><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14pt"><font face="Calibri">Generally yes if they are work clothes or uniforms if <strong>required</strong> and <strong>NOT suitable for everyday use.<span>  </span></strong>That deduction would include the cost and upkeep if both requirements are met.</font></span></p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14pt"></span><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14pt"><font face="Calibri">If I purchase a nice suit for business, it is not a deduction as it has alternate use.</font></span></p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14pt"></span><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14pt"><font face="Calibri">If I am a professional clown (<em>no comments please</em>), then the clown suit with the big shoes, etc. would be a deduction.<span>  </span>Yes, It has alternate use but I probably would not use it to go to the mall.</font></span></p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14pt"></span><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14pt"><font face="Calibri">Nor is it enough that you do not, in fact wear your work clothes away from work. The clothing must not be suitable for taking the place of your regular clothing.</font></span><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14pt"><font face="Calibri"> </font></span><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14pt"> <a href="http://www.usataxhelp.com/">www.USATaxHelp.com</a></span></p>
<p><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14pt"></span><span style="line-height: 115%; font-size: 14pt"><span style="font-size: 14pt"></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/03/03/work-clothes-deduction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scholarship Count Toward Support?</title>
		<link>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/02/12/scholarship-count-toward-support/</link>
		<comments>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/02/12/scholarship-count-toward-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/02/12/scholarship-count-toward-support/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Publication 17, &#8220;A scholarship received by a child who is a full-time student is not taken into account in determining whether or not the child provided more than half of his or her own support.&#8221;   
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 12pt">According to Publication 17, &#8220;A scholarship received by a child who is a full-time student is not taken into account in determining whether or not the child provided more than half of his or her own support.&#8221;   </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/02/12/scholarship-count-toward-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mileage Rates in 2009</title>
		<link>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/02/07/mileage-rates-in-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/02/07/mileage-rates-in-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[International Taxation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sub S Corporations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[LLC's]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/02/07/mileage-rates-in-2009/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2009 Standard Mileage rates for the use of a car (includes Pickups, Vans and Panel Trucks):

55 cents per mile for business miles driven (decreases to 50 cents per mile in 2010)
24.0 cents per mile driven for medical or moving purposes (decreases to 16.5 in 2010)
14 cents per mile driven in service of charitable organizations (same in 2010)

Runzheimer International [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+0"><strong><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: black">2009</span></strong><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; color: black"> Standard <strong>Mileage </strong>rates for the use of a car (<em>includes Pickups, Vans and Panel Trucks</em>):</span><span style="font-family: Georgia, serif; color: black; font-size: 14pt"></span></font></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li style="line-height: 15.6pt; background-color: white; color: black; -webkit-background-clip: initial; -webkit-background-origin: initial" class="MsoNormal"><font size="+0"><strong><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt">55 </span></strong><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt">cents per mile for <strong>business</strong> miles driven (<em>decreases to 50 cents per mile in 2010</em>)</span></font></li>
<li style="line-height: 15.6pt; background-color: white; color: black; -webkit-background-clip: initial; -webkit-background-origin: initial" class="MsoNormal"><font size="+0"><strong><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt">24.0</span></strong><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt"> cents per mile driven for <strong>medical</strong> or <strong>moving</strong> purposes (<em>decreases to 16.5 in 2010</em>)</span><span style="font-family: Georgia, serif; font-size: 18pt"></span></font></li>
<li style="line-height: 15.6pt; background-color: white; color: black; -webkit-background-clip: initial; -webkit-background-origin: initial" class="MsoNormal"><font size="+0"><strong><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt">14</span></strong><span style="font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt"> cents per mile driven in service of <strong>charitable</strong> organizations (<em>same in 2010</em>)</span></font></li>
</ul>
<p><font size="3" class="Apple-style-span"><span style="font-size: 13px" class="Apple-style-span"><font size="+0">Runzheimer International conducts an annual study of fixed and variable expenses to operate a vehicle.  </font></span></font>Please note the Business Mileage Deduction may not be used if a vehicle has been depreciated using MACRS or depreciated using  <span style="line-height: 24px; font-size: 21px" class="Apple-style-span">§179.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/02/07/mileage-rates-in-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do You Have to File?</title>
		<link>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/02/05/do-you-have-to-file/</link>
		<comments>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/02/05/do-you-have-to-file/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/02/05/do-you-have-to-file/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That depends on the AMOUNT of income AND the TYPE of income.  Filing is not required if all of your income is from W2 Wages, Interest, Dividends and Other Miscellaneous Inocme (excluding Social Security) AND if the total income is less than the Standard Deduction plus personal exemptions.
2009 example:A Single person&#8217;s standard deduction is $5,700.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That depends on the <strong>AMOUNT </strong>of income <strong>AND</strong> the <strong>TYPE</strong> of income.  Filing is not required if all of your income is from W2 Wages, Interest, Dividends and Other Miscellaneous Inocme (<em>excluding Social Security</em>) AND if the total income is less than the Standard Deduction plus personal exemptions.</p>
<p><strong><em>2009 example:</em></strong><strong><em>A Single person&#8217;s standard deduction is $5,700.  Add a personal exemption of $3,650.  Total $9,350.  That means on the first $9,350 of income there is no Income Tax liability and <strong>NO</strong> filing requirement.  If the taxpayer is 65 or older, or blind add another $1,400 to the standard deduction for a total of $10,750.</p>
<p></em></strong>But it&#8217;s not really that simple.  Let&#8217;s assume this single person&#8217;s only source of income was $1,000 of self employment income.  The Income Tax is zero BUT the return must be filed due to Self Employment Tax liability on Self Employment Income of $400 or greater!</p>
<p>Suppose the person&#8217;s self employment income is $200 and that&#8217;s all.  Sounds like no filing requirement.  The self employment income bottom line may be only $200, but let&#8217;s say the business of the self employed person generated $1,000,000 in sales with enough expenses to generate only a $200 profit. </p>
<p>YES, there is a filing requirement!  Think about it.. a million dollars passing through a self employed person&#8217;s hand should be accounted for. <span class="article_separator"> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/02/05/do-you-have-to-file/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cost Segregation = Tax Savings</title>
		<link>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/02/05/cost-segregation-tax-savings/</link>
		<comments>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/02/05/cost-segregation-tax-savings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[International Taxation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sub S Corporations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[LLC's]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/02/05/cost-segregation-tax-savings/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Cost Segregation is a VERY BENEFICIAL tax angle used by real estate owners to ACCELERATE DEPRECIATION deductions.
In the past it was primarily used by large accounting firms and larger clients.  The ability for smaller building owners to utilize these techniques is now becoming popular.
It takes an engineering study and an accounting firm that understands the issues.
Generally [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="left"><a href="http://irstaxtalk.com/__oneclick_uploads/2010/02/phoenix-of-troy.jpg" title="Client property (NY State)"><img src="http://irstaxtalk.com/__oneclick_uploads/2010/02/phoenix-of-troy.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Client property (NY State)" /></a></p>
<p align="left">Cost Segregation is a VERY BENEFICIAL tax angle used by real estate owners to ACCELERATE DEPRECIATION deductions.</p>
<p>In the past it was primarily used by large accounting firms and larger clients.  The ability for smaller building owners to utilize these techniques is now becoming popular.</p>
<p>It takes an engineering study and an accounting firm that understands the issues.</p>
<p><strong>Generally</strong> here is how it works&#8230;..</p>
<p>An engineering study is completed to identify components in a buiding that can be depreciated over 5, 7 and 15 years instead of 39 years for commercial property and 27.5 for residential property.</p>
<p>We then prepare what is called an ACCOUNTING CHANGE and the prior year(s) of lower depreciation are now adjusted in one year!</p>
<p>This is alot of paperwork but it is often worth it.  You are welcome to contact us if you have questions <a href="http://www.USATaxHelp.com" title="USATaxHelp.com our main website">www.USATaxHelp.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/02/05/cost-segregation-tax-savings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Breast Implants - Deductible Medical Expense?</title>
		<link>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/02/04/breast-implants-deductible-medical-expense/</link>
		<comments>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/02/04/breast-implants-deductible-medical-expense/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 13:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/02/04/breast-implants-deductible-medical-expense/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No.  They are considered cosmetic.  But what if they are implanted in conjunction with a deductible procedure?
Tax Court Case O&#8217;Donnabhain (2010), 134 TC No. 4 The Tax Court has held that an individual could deduct as a medical care expense under Code Sec. 213 amounts paid for hormone therapy and sex reassignment surgery that were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.  They are considered cosmetic.  But what if they are implanted in conjunction with a deductible procedure?</p>
<p>Tax Court Case <span style="font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; color: #1a1a1a; font-size: 10pt"><strong>O&#8217;Donnabhain (2010), </strong><a name="NEWSLTR:510843.2-1"></a><strong>134 TC No. 4 </strong></span><span style="font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'"></span><span style="font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; color: #1a1a1a; font-size: 9.5pt">The Tax Court has held that an individual could deduct as a medical care expense under <a name="NEWSLTR:510843.3-1"></a>Code Sec. 213 <a name="NEWSLTR:510843.3"></a>amounts paid for hormone therapy and sex reassignment surgery that were incurred in connection with a condition known as gender identity disorder, which the Tax Court found to be a disease. However, it found that breast augmentation surgery that the individual also had in connection with the disorder was <strong>cosmetic</strong> surgery and amounts paid for it were <strong>not deductible</strong> under <a name="NEWSLTR:510843.4-1"></a>Code Sec. 213(d)(9)<a name="NEWSLTR:510843.4"></a>. </span><span style="font-family: 'Verdana','sans-serif'; font-size: 10pt"></p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/02/04/breast-implants-deductible-medical-expense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Work for Pay Credit - How much did you receive?</title>
		<link>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/01/26/work-for-pay-credit-how-much-did-you-receive/</link>
		<comments>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/01/26/work-for-pay-credit-how-much-did-you-receive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/01/26/work-for-pay-credit-how-much-did-you-receive/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This credit is available in 2009 and 2010.  According to IRS instructions, taxpayers who received the $250 economic stimulus payment in 2009 (Social Security recipients, SSI, railroad retirement and Veteran&#8217;s Disability or Pension benefits) must reduce the Form 1040 credit by this amount.
The math is simple BUT we forsee a few problems.  Since the check is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This credit is available in 2009 and 2010.  According to IRS instructions, taxpayers who received the $250 economic stimulus payment in 2009 (<em>Social Security recipients, SSI, railroad retirement and Veteran&#8217;s Disability or Pension benefits</em>) must reduce the Form 1040 credit by this amount.</p>
<p>The math is simple BUT we forsee a few problems.  Since the check is probably directly deposited, many taxpayers are going to say &#8220;don&#8217;t know if I received it&#8221;.  YUP, that&#8217;s what they will say.  Then the question is, how do we know for sure when preparing a return (<em>and trying to avoid preparer penalties</em>)&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>IRS instructions say if you &#8220;if you do not know&#8221; you should <strong>personally</strong> contact the Social Security or the paying agency.  IRS nor Social Security has any electronic link to obtain this information (<em>we had a link for the Economic Stimulus Rebate in 2009 for 2008</em>).</p>
<p>Here is a link to more specific information on the IRS website <a href="http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=205927,00.html">Making Work Pay Questions and Answers: Economic Recovery Payments</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/01/26/work-for-pay-credit-how-much-did-you-receive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Work for Pay Credit 2009 &#038; 2010</title>
		<link>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/01/26/work-for-pay-credit/</link>
		<comments>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/01/26/work-for-pay-credit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/01/26/work-for-pay-credit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Depending on your AGI (Adjusted Gross Income - that is the bottom line of the first page of your personal Form 1040), you may be eligible for a $400 credit ($800 if married filing joint). 
For 2009, if your filing status is Single, Head of Household or Married filing separate, the phase out of the credit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depending on your AGI (Adjusted Gross Income - <em>that is the bottom line of the first page of your personal Form 1040</em>), you may be eligible for a $400 credit ($<em>800 if married filing joint</em>). </p>
<p>For 2009, if your filing status is Single, Head of Household or Married filing separate, the phase out of the credit begins at $75,000 and ends at $95,000.  That means if you made less than $75k, you get the whole $400.  If you made $95k, you get none.</p>
<p>If your filing status if Married Filing Joint, the phase out begins at $150k and ends at $190k.</p>
<p>We do not know at this time whether the AGI restrictions will be exactly the same for 2010.</p>
<p>You MAY have already received up to $250 of the credit if you are a recipient of Social Security, SSI, railroad retirement, Veteran&#8217;s disability compensation or pension benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/01/26/work-for-pay-credit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LLC to be taxed as a Corporation?</title>
		<link>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/01/26/llc-to-be-taxed-as-a-corporation/</link>
		<comments>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/01/26/llc-to-be-taxed-as-a-corporation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Sub S Corporations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[LLC's]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Income Tax]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/01/26/llc-to-be-taxed-as-a-corporation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Until you know you are going to stick with it (no offense, many clients try stuff and change their mind), I would not consider the extra paperwork involved with having the NEW LLC taxed as a corporation.  You can find more information on our website for Sub S Corporations www.USATaxHelp.com and also the why you really want [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 11pt"><font face="Times New Roman">Until you know you are going to stick with it (<em>no offense, many clients try stuff and change their mind</em>), I would not consider the extra paperwork involved with having the NEW LLC taxed as a corporation.  You can find more information on our website for Sub S Corporations </font><a target="_blank" href="http://www.usataxhelp.com/"><font face="Times New Roman">www.USATaxHelp.com</font></a> and also the why you really want at least an LLC as a business entity.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt"> </span><span style="font-size: 11pt">If you know for sure you are continuing, then the &#8220;S&#8221; corp election for the LLC is usually an excellent decision.  Seriously, read the two handouts on our main website for &#8220;S&#8221; Corps and LLC&#8217;s at <a href="http://www.usataxhelp.com/">www.USATaxHelp.com</a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://irstaxtalk.com/2010/01/26/llc-to-be-taxed-as-a-corporation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
